Sunday, May 17, 2009

Will the majority of the Council be a rubber stamp for the Mayor?

There has been plenty of blog comments on Esslinger's actions with regard to refusing to reappoint long serving members of the Parks Board and Plan Commission.  

I'd like this thread to focus on what you think the rest of the council will do... see NW editorial.  We can be pretty sure McHugh will side with Esslinger and I'd be surprised if Palmeri didn't vote with Esslinger too...those three seem to be a pretty tight "voting block".  I'm hopeful that King and Tower will not support the mayor in his "power grab" so that leaves Poeschl as the "swing vote" will he do the right thing and refuse to approve Esslinger's appointments or will he once again take direction from Palmeri and vote the same?  This vote could give us some insight as to how the vote to replace a council member will go.  I wouldn't be the farm on Poeschl but I do hold out hope he will do the right thing and reject Esslinger's power grab appointments.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Schneider Seems to "get it" Lemberger... Not So Much

Finished watching the board meeting.  Well the intellectual lights just weren't shining that bright tonight.  

Schneider seemed to understand the situation the board was in but wasn't really able to explain it so Lemberger understood.  Let me try a little more bluntly than Schneider:

For every dollar you take OFF the table (middle school re-alignment, media staffing, start times, etc.) you have to find somewhere else to cut.  Since Administration has brought forward the plan they think is best, it is up to you  Lemberger to suggest alternative areas to cut.  That certainly didn't happen tonight.  

Oh and by the way you can't cut $120,000 out of the budget and then find alternative funding and then count that cut again... it is still only $120,000 cut not $240,000  (I thought Math and Science went together???)

So how long do you think the next meeting will last?  Do you think by the end of the meeting the BOE will have $2.2M in cuts approved?  


Here's a Topic: Budget Reconciliation

I'm disappointed that there are no materials (that I can find) posted on the District's website or in the NW regarding the topics that will be discussed at the Special School Board Meeting tonight.  It was obvious at the last meeting that there were not 4 votes (on the new board) for the Administrations plan.  I for one would like to know what the alternative plan(s) for cutting ~ $2M is.  

This link to the NW provides information on the original proposal.  What do you agree with, disagree with and if you disagree with a portion, where in the budget would you cut to make up the dollars?


Keep personalities out of it please, I don't want to have to shut this down when I've barely begun!

Friday, May 1, 2009

School Board Elections

Well the next year should be an interesting one for the school board. Schneider is president and Lemberger is VP. Anyone surprised Becker isn't VP? As loyal as Becker has always been to Schneider and given his years of experience vs. Lemberger's I was surprised it was Lemberger who ended up VP.

I have to wonder if this is the beginning of a long alliance or a one vote aberration. Philosophically does Lemberger really line up with Becker and Schneider? Is Monte a wild card or will she fall in line with those 2 like a good little girl? This has the makings of a good Soap Opera.

How much of his agenda will Schneider be able to accomplish? He seems to have the votes to get his way but, will it be as easy as he thinks? The fact is there appears no end in sight to the budget cuts year after year and let's not forget the promises to ADD dollars to maintenance. Where exactly will the cuts come from? It seems that the Schneider, Monte, Becker trifecta has already put a number of things off limits: no teacher cuts, no program cuts, no maintenance cuts. So where will the cuts come from? From past comments it appears the targets will be staff salary/benefit packages and administrator positions...will that be enough?

I'll be watching things closely. Let us know what you think...